Reaction to Nick Clegg speech on employee share ownership
Here’s a selection of responses to Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg’s proposals to widen employee share ownership [e-reward.co.uk news].
Justin Rix, Employer Solutions Partner, Grant Thornton, said:
"In our experience, companies that operate employee share plans report greater employee engagement and an improvement in the interest in the performance of the business. This in turn can lead to better business performance and increased company value. We look forward to hearing more details of these proposals and would encourage the government to consult widely to ensure that new arrangements will meet the commercial requirements of business of all sizes."
Catherine Wilson, Employment Partner at law firm, Thomas Eggar, said:
“The perceived advantages of employee share ownership have been well documented and include greater employee motivation and loyalty. This in turn should improve employee retention and productivity as well as hopefully discouraging employment claims.
“The introduction of such a scheme can raise a number of legal issues. It is clear that if this new ‘right’ is introduced, employers will need to have a formal agreement in place to adequately deal with the allocation and disposal of shares. In the case of an unlisted company then any scheme would need to include the creation of an internal market for the shares to be sold. The costs associated with both the creation and administration of such a scheme could be quite considerable. Employers will also need to define who is entitled to qualify for share ownership, for example, what is an appropriate minimum service requirement and how the scheme should treat women on maternity leave, staff taking career breaks and those absent on long term sickness. Consideration will also need to be given as to the often-vexed definition of good and bad leavers.
“Other legal implications are unclear at this stage. It is not clear whether employers will be permitted to require their employees to accept a lower salary in return for getting shares, thus requiring a change to the terms and conditions of employment contracts. Smaller employers may also fear a dilution of share ownership and the resultant lack of control over key business decisions. Historically, certain schemes attract considerable tax advantages if they are approved by HMRC but again it is not clear whether these tax benefits will apply to the new style schemes. Even employment law claims relating to dismissals may become slightly more complex as this additional benefit will need to be taken into account when calculating loss.
“Finally whilst a scheme seeking to reward those who contribute to the success of the business must generally be welcomed, the devil will be in the detail of the agreements and the legislative framework. Perhaps most importantly, some care will be required to manage employee expectations not least because of the unpleasant truth that shares may go down as well as up!”
“EOA is delighted that the government recognises the benefits of employee ownership. Employee owned businesses make a significant contribution to the national economy and the Employee Ownership Association, with a membership of 118 employee-owned businesses ranging from the John Lewis Partnership with 76,500 partners to businesses with less than 10 employees, will continue to spearhead the drive for expansion of this sector.
“The priority now should be to establish fiscal and other incentives that will help drive a step change in the levels of employee ownership across the economy, giving large numbers of employees a stake in the businesses in which they work – which in turn could help to drive growth and address a broader challenge at the heart of UK society and its workforce.”
Want to know more?
Want to know more?
You can read Nick Clegg's full speech online at www.dpm.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/news/deputy-prime-minister-s-speech-mansion-house.
Update on the Regulation of Pay in Financial Services
Pay in the financial services sector continues to provide ample material for the media, with high-profile bank executives seemingly queuing up to waive their bonuses, whether out of a sense of honour or necessity. Generally bankers’ bonuses, af...